AI in Education: Let’s get it right.
There’s a lot of pressure right now to ship and use AI everywhere and in everything. The tech industry is moving fast. It often feels like there’s no space to pause and truly, deeply consider the decisions we are making.
That pressure is hitting education hard. Edtech companies and curriculum publishers are making consequential decisions about what AI should do, what it should sound like, what it should be allowed to decide, sometimes without folks in the room who have the technical knowledge of how AI works, or the experience of having already made those decisions at scale.
FoxBot Industries has both. We bring the technical depth to understand what AI can and can’t do, and the experience to know where it belongs in a learning experience, and where it doesn’t. We know how to use it as a tool that enables and enhances. And we know where human decision-making, human pacing, and human support are irreplaceable.
Where this comes from
FoxBot’s founder spent several years inside the eye of the “AI hurricane” working in Microsoft’s Office of the CTO on AI product strategy and defining how humans and AI systems should interact.
She pushed for gender-neutral voice by default across all of Microsoft’s Copilots, because the passive, hyperfeminine AI voice wasn’t just an aesthetic choice, it was teaching people something false about women and power, hundreds of millions of interactions at a time. She defined the agent UX principles now used across dozens of Microsoft product groups. She worked on responsible AI guidance for agentic systems before most people knew what an agent was.
She also designed NGSS-aligned curriculum for K–12 students, produced 500+ educational videos watched by 3M+ people, and wrote Beginning Breadboarding (Springer/Nature, 2023)m a book that teaches electronics to people who thought it wasn’t for them.
That combination – AI product leadership, curriculum design, and the ability to make complex things feel possible for real humans – is what FoxBot brings to this work.
Who this is for
You’re building or adapting a learning product and you’re adding AI. You’re moving fast. You care about getting it right but you’re not sure what “right” looks like in practice. You want an experienced outside perspective: honest, specific guidance on what’s working, what’s risky, and what to fix first.
What we do together
The AI Learning Integrity Review is a focused, two-week engagement:
- A 2-hour intake conversation with your product and curriculum leads
- A structured review of your AI features against a responsible learning framework covering: human primacy, representation and voice, learner transparency, pedagogical integrity, data and privacy, and equity
- A 1-hour findings presentation with specific recommendations
- A written report you can actually act on
- 30 days of async follow-up via email
Investment: starting at $8,000
Let’s talk
If you’re building learning products and you want to make sure the AI in them is actually good for learners — not just fast to ship — I’d love to hear what you’re working on.
➡️Book a 30-minute intro call (Calendly link)